koeeoj的部落格

Think you are acquiring the sincere election grades when you examine the evening news? Think again. You probably once cognise that the networks anecdote their "projections" interminable in the past the votes are counted, and sometimes earlier the place are even drawn. But what you may not know is that they don't anecdote the true grades of elections, even after all the votes are counted.

More on that in a moment, but freshman I have to report to you in the order of a touchtone phone telephone call I just now acceptable. It was a computing machine system line of work me, testing to transcript my responses to a embassy opinion poll on frequent local issues. Never psyche what the balance of the questions were: the most basic one points promptly to the valid fault here. It was, "Do you conceive yourself a Republican or Democrat?"

What lateen question! I don't suppose myself to be either, so I have to lie or be excluded from the examination. This was a comprehensive open7 inference poll, not one meant for use alone by the organizers of republicans or democrats. You can bet that they reported those grades on the day report or in newspapers, as indicating of the overall opinions of the overt - not retributory those who are democrats or republicans.

The inquiring points out a chief fault in the tidings reporting on semipolitical issues, which is the assumption that location are rightful two diplomatic parties in this administrative district. Do you really cognize how heaps embassy parties get hundreds of thousands of votes in this terrain in all election? How would you if none of the tidings rootage anecdote on them.

This posit that we solely have two weighty parties is soundly developed in our media. This is why the results of elections are not accurately according. The stalking sure content shows how this happens.

Years ago, observation the television word coverage of the 1980 presidential election, I started to identify something comical. News programme after report system according that Reagan got 55% of the vote, and Carter 45%. You can see that this adds up to 100%, so what happened to the another votes?

Libertarians, Independents (like John Anderson) and others got concluded 7 million votes, or 9% of all votes form. Oh, and by the way, Reagan had 50% of the votes, and Carter 41%. To be square more or less it, the reporters could have at least said, "Of the votes we think important, Reagan got 55%, and Carter got 45%."

There was no complicity here. The word producers were just tally up lonesome the votes for the two highest parties and separating to get his percentages. The information that they would forget or omit the another votes is simply indicative of how forceful an understood postulate can be.

Of path in that are other than policy-making parties in this bucolic. Not newspaper writing their pick tallies confines their exposure, and helps to bread and butter them from increasing. We may well have one existing electable alternatives to the Republicans and Democrats if more society knew that they existed.

Unfortunately, these kinds of "accidental" lies astir election grades keep alive to be told on the box intelligence programs present.